Technologies and Asylum Procedures
After the COVID-19 pandemic halted many asylum procedures around Europe, fresh technologies are actually reviving these systems. Right from lie diagnosis tools analyzed at the border to a program for confirming documents and transcribes interviews, a wide range of systems is being applied to asylum applications. This article is exploring Read More Here just how these solutions have reshaped the ways asylum procedures are conducted. It reveals how asylum seekers will be transformed into required hindered techno-users: They are asked to adhere to a series of techno-bureaucratic steps and also to keep up with capricious tiny within criteria and deadlines. This kind of obstructs their capacity to steer these devices and to go after their right for cover.
It also illustrates how these kinds of technologies happen to be embedded in refugee governance: They facilitate the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a flutter of dispersed technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity by hindering all of them from getting at the channels of proper protection. It further argues that examines of securitization and victimization should be put together with an insight into the disciplinary mechanisms worth mentioning technologies, by which migrants are turned into data-generating subjects exactly who are disciplined by their reliance on technology.
Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal understanding, the article states that these systems have an inherent obstructiveness. There is a double effect: whilst they assist to expedite the asylum method, they also generate it difficult pertaining to refugees to navigate these types of systems. They are simply positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes these people vulnerable to illegitimate decisions of non-governmental actors, and ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their situations. Moreover, they pose new risks of’machine mistakes’ which may result in erroneous or discriminatory outcomes.
